25
revealed to any other person or office unless written permission is granted by the
individual to share their information.
Considerations for Reporting Incidents of Prohibited Conduct.
The University encourages individuals to report incidents involving Prohibited Conduct and other
potential violations of this policy. The University does not limit the timeframe for reporting an
incident regardless of when the incident occurred. However, individuals are encouraged to
report as soon as practical as memories may fade, and evidence may be lost over time.
Reports of potential violations of this policy will be kept private to the extent possible for the
University to respond to the report, but reports made to the above officials are not confidential.
Upon being notified of a report, the appropriate official will reach out to the individual to
schedule an Intake Interview and will also provide the individual with information regarding
resources, rights, Supportive Measures, and reporting options, with or without filing a Formal
Complaint.
Once the individual has shared their experience with the University official, the next steps will be
determined based on the stated needs, preferences, and the official’s assessment of campus
safety needs. In many cases, the next steps can be mutually designed and range from support
strategies designed just for the reporting individual (e.g. Campus Safety escorts, class or work
schedule adjustments, mentoring, etc.), to a full-scale investigation designed to determine if
there is sufficient evidence to demonstrate that a policy violation occurred.
Amnesty Principles
If an individual (e.g., bystander, complainant, witness, etc.) expresses reluctance to participate
in a Prohibited Conduct investigation because of illicit behaviors engaged in simultaneous to, or
as part of the incident/relationship under investigation, it is the general practice for these
violations to be met with non-punitive (discipline-free) measures. Non-punitive measures may
include, but are not limited to, regular conversations with Student Life and/or Campus Safety
personnel and could also include a requirement to sign a covenant regarding future behavior
commitments.
However, if the illicit behaviors violate local, state, or federal law, or are assessed to represent
an on-going risk to campus safety, University officials may be obligated to report the behavior to
the appropriate agency or campus partners.
In all cases, if individuals in an investigation have questions or concerns about disclosing self-
incriminating information, they are invited and empowered to interrupt investigatory efforts by
asking to talk theoretically or hypothetically about amnesty policies. Requests will be responded
to on a case-by-case basis within a framework of care, compassion, and constructive
assistance. The officials involved in these processes are comfortable with and committed to the
complex and nuanced work of seperating peripheral conduct violations with those violations that
originated, exacerbated, or are central to the complaint.
Anonymity
If the individual requests anonymity (i.e. for the Respondent to not be informed of the
complaint), he or she should be aware that the University’s ability to act on their behalf may
become limited. In other words, although multiple support resources will be made available to
the disclosing individual, no actions may be taken against the accused individual that could be